It would be easy to blame author Dan Brown and his blockbuster book and
subsequent movie, “The Da Vinci Code”, for renewed public interest in the
mysteries surrounding the world’s most famous portrait. The novel imagines all
sorts of keys in the artist’s work that unlock mysteries of the ages. But even
before Brown published his fictional tome, Mona Lisa has been an object of
scrutiny for 500 years as scholars have tried to find answers to questions
raised by the masterpiece.
It would be easy to blame author Dan Brown and his blockbuster book and
subsequent movie, “The Da Vinci Code”, for renewed public interest in the
mysteries surrounding the world’s most famous portrait. The novel imagines all
sorts of keys in the artist’s work that unlock mysteries of the ages. But even
before Brown published his fictional tome, Mona Lisa has been an object of
scrutiny for 500 years as scholars have tried to find answers to questions
raised by the masterpiece.
There are numerous theories about Mona Lisa’s identity, and more than a
dozen others from Da Vinci’s time are thought to have been the sitter for the
portrait, including the revered artist’s male assistant (and, some say,
possible lover), Gian Giacomo Caprotti da Oreno, better known as Salaì. Other
researchers have even posited that the painting is indeed a self-portrait.
With Da Vinci himself writing little about the painting, researchers have
relied on other clues instead, including the painting’s name, that the woman is
Gherardini, wife of Francesco del Giocondo, who lived near Da Vinci. Scholars
explain that the term “Monna Lisa”—or “Lady Lisa”—is how the woman would have
been addressed in her time. Moreover, the painting is called La Gioconda in
Italian and La Joconde in French, both meaning a happy or jovial person. In
Italian, though, it could also be a pun on Gherardini’s married name.
0 comments :
Post a Comment